| | | | | ![]() | |
| | | | | ||
![]() | | | |||
| | | | | ||
| | | | | ||
| | | | |||
| | #16 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Stoney Creek,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 8,983
| I would suspect that the problems with the car are half his fault and the other half are the car's.
__________________ Politics is the art of glad-handing,passionate b*llsh*t and hidden agendas. |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Never ending process! | Quote:
![]() edit: Lets hope he doesnt get a BMW like this one... BMW on Dyno
__________________ Jim B 87 GN, Fast Company Powered 11.49@118.55 Hey Jim, WHICH MACKEY IS THAT ???? MAGNA Member Last edited by JBenn911 : 01-30-2007 at 02:11 AM. | |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Whats that thing ? Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Montgomery Township, PA
Posts: 2,544
| As a V owner, I can only say, if you are going to draw an opinion of the CTS-V, based on the Azzhat you saw in that video, than you are probably a tool yourself...Your turbo Buick isn't / wasn't perfect either and one bad mechanic can have you coming back to the dealer often, in any car. I am flipping my 2004 for a 2007 V this July ! I have never owned a car for 3 years and wanted to replace it with the exact same car. The rear IS the only real problem with this car. Other than that it is an awesome automobile that I would highly recommend. Just another opinion... ![]()
__________________ 1987 GN - The Black One |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Never ending process! | Cut me a good deal, Joe ??? ![]()
__________________ Jim B 87 GN, Fast Company Powered 11.49@118.55 Hey Jim, WHICH MACKEY IS THAT ???? MAGNA Member |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) | |
| Someone Crown My Ass! Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North East, MD USA
Posts: 7,017
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ 2002 T/A LS-1 26k Happy now girls | |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| I'm the Best! | funny how that list controdicts itself.. so a escalade ext is unreliable but yet the yukon is reliable? hate to bust your bubble.. its a fact that GM is one of the best out there for reliablity! hmm where do i start... 305 carb/tbi/vortec 307 350 carb/tbi/vortec 3.8 all of them 4.3 nuff said 5.3 6.0 8.1 6.6 (duramax) the ol' mightly 454 all of them LS1's LS6's and the 4.1 in the trailblazer every last one of them will go well over 200k with the right service. ie. oil changes, filters etc. i've been seeing the oh so great honda's with blown motors with 120k on the clock. oh thats right.. honda's great i just dont see where they're worth it. uncomfterable, no balls looks and drives like crap.... if i ever went import its audi or vw.
__________________ Rob 87 GN fully loaded.. learning to walk again ![]() 03 vw GTI- wicked tuning turbo back, forged 007 diverter.. revo stage 2 coming soon 04 SC/MCSS 14.89 gone ![]() "But the day may come when you've got something to lose, and just when you think you're done paying dues And you say to yourself, dear God what Have I done? And hope its not too late 'cause tomorrow may never come." |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Someone Crown My Ass! Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North East, MD USA
Posts: 7,017
| Auto News & Advice 2006 Annual Car Reliability Survey advertisement Consumer Reports offers in-depth vehicle reports for every model tested - to help you make the right purchasing decision on your next car or truck. Japanese imports earned 39 of the 47 top reliability honors, while US. and European models scored well below average in this Consumer Reports study. Our latest survey forecasts which cars are likely to be troublesome and which will hold up well. Our 2006 Annual Car Reliability Survey, the largest of its kind, gathered responses on about 1.3 million vehicles from Consumer Reports and ConsumerReports.org subscribers. These results underpin the most comprehensive reliability data you will find anywhere. Such a large survey response—30 percent more than in 2005—allows us to provide reliability data on some very recently introduced models, such as the Honda Fit, the redesigned Chevrolet Tahoe, and the Lexus ES350. We can also report on some expensive and low-volume models like the Mercedes-Benz SL and the Porsche 911. Predicted reliability for 2007 models is our forecast of how well the models that are currently on sale are likely to hold up, based on how they've done in the past. It's based on the reported overall reliability Ratings for the past three model years (2004 to 2006) if the model hasn't changed significantly for 2007. One or two years of reliability data may be used if a model was new or has been redesigned in that period. Here we give you the first look at our new predicted reliability Ratings for new cars based on this survey, and the models that we expect to be the most and least reliable. The difference between the best and worst models is striking. For example, the least-reliable vehicle in our survey, the redesigned for 2006 Mercedes-Benz M-Class SUV, is likely to have 10 times as many problems as the Toyota Highlander Hybrid, which debuted the same year. Here are some highlights from our survey: Several new and redesigned models were very reliable, countering the trend of most models' having more problems in the first year of a new design. Especially notable are some new U.S. models. The Lincoln Zephyr, introduced in 2006, was the second most reliable upscale sedan after the 2007 Lexus ES350. The Zephyr's platform mates, the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, also new for 2006, scored slightly better than V6 versions of the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry. The Buick Lucerne and Cadillac DTS both scored above average in their first year. Above-average first-year reliability for the new Subaru Tribeca makes Subaru the only automaker to have its entire lineup of cars recommended by Consumer Reports. All Subaru's except the WRX STi have better-than-average predicted reliability. The STi is average. Mercedes-Benz, on the other hand, does not have a single model reliable enough to be recommended. Nissan's reliability has improved somewhat. Last year, the Quest, Armada, Titan, and especially the Infiniti QX56, all built at Nissan's Canton, Miss. factory, had the worst reliability in our survey. This year, while the predicted reliability of the Armada and QX56 are still about 135 percent worse than the average vehicle, they had half as many problems as they did in last year's survey. The Quest, while still much worse than average this year, had fewer problems than minivans from General Motors. Of the 47 vehicles on the most-reliable list, 39 were from Japanese automakers. Six came from the domestic automakers, and one each came from South Korea and Europe. Twenty-one Toyota vehicles earned top ratings. Honda had 11 vehicles at the top of our ratings. Ford, General Motors, and Subaru each had three, Mitsubishi and Nissan each had two, while Hyundai and Mini each had one. Of the 45 least reliable models, 19 were European, 20 were from U.S. manufacturers, 5 were Japanese, and 1 was South Korean. General Motors had 12, Mercedes-Benz had 8, Ford and Nissan each had 5, Chrysler and Volkswagen each had 3, BMW and Jaguar each had 2, while Kia, Land Rover, Porsche, Saab, and Volvo each had 1. In most categories, the best vehicles have much-better-than-average predicted reliability. A few exceptions are among minivans and sporty cars, where the best vehicles rated only better than average. In all categories except small cars, the worst vehicles rated much worse than average. The worst small cars had worse than average predicted reliability. Below is a rundown of how cars fared in each category. CRUNCHING THE NUMBERS To help car buyers find trustworthy vehicles, Consumer Reports conducts an extensive reliability survey of its approximately 6.7 million magazine and online subscribers every year. We ask them about any serious problems they have had with their vehicles in the preceding 12 months. This wealth of responses helps us build comprehensive Reliability History charts for vehicles covering ten model years from 1997 to 2006. They show how well older models are holding up and what types of problems they have had. For new car buyers, we use the Reliability History data to determine our Predicted Reliability Ratings for 2007 models. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Best & worst models These 2007 models earned the highest and lowest predicted-reliability ratings, based on CR's 2006 reliability survey. Models marked with (2006) have been redesigned for 2007. Models with * use data based on one model year only. Most reliable Vehicles listed in scoring order, starting with the best score. SMALL CARS: Honda Fit*, Toyota Yaris*, Honda Civic Hybrid*, Toyota Corolla. FAMILY CARS: Honda Accord Hybrid, Toyota Prius, Honda Accord (4-cyl.), Ford Fusion*, Mercury Milan*. UPSCALE/LARGE CARS: Lexus ES350*, Lincoln Zephyr*, Hyundai Azera*, Acura TSX, Acura TL. LUXURY CARS: Lexus LS (2006), Infiniti M*. SPORTY CARS/ CONVERTIBLES/COUPES: Lexus SC, Toyota Camry Solara (4-cyl.), Subaru Impreza WRX, Honda S2000, Mitsubishi Eclipse*, Mini Cooper Hatchback (2006). WAGONS/MINIVANS: Pontiac Vibe, Scion xB, Toyota Matrix, Toyota Sienna. SMALL SUVS: Toyota FJ Cruiser*, Honda Element, Honda CR-V (2006), Toyota RAV4*, Mitsubishi Outlander (2006)*, Subaru Forester . MIDSIZED SUVS: Toyota Highlander Hybrid*, Toyota 4Runner, Toyota Highlander, Honda Pilot, Lexus RX400h (hybrid)*, Acura MDX (2006). LARGE SUVS: Toyota Land Cruiser, Lexus LX, Toyota Sequoia, Chevrolet Tahoe*, GMC Yukon*. PICKUP TRUCKS: Subaru Baja, Toyota Tundra, Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier (V6). Least reliable Vehicles listed in scoring order, starting with the worst score. SMALL CARS: Chevrolet Cobalt, Nissan Sentra (2006), Volkswagen Jetta (5-cyl.), Chevrolet Aveo. FAMILY CARS: Volkswagen Passat (4-cyl.)* UPSCALE/LARGE CARS: Jaguar X-Type, Chrysler 300 (V8), Saab 9-3. LUXURY CARS: Cadillac STS (V8), Mercedes-Benz S-Class (2006), Mercedes-Benz CLS*, Mercedes-Benz E-Class Sedan, BMW 7 Series, Jaguar S-Type. SPORTS/SPORTY CARS: Pontiac Solstice*, Mercedes-Benz SL, Mercedes-Benz CLK, Mercedes-Benz SLK (V6), Chevrolet Corvette, Porsche 911, Carrera, Ford Mustang (V6). WAGONS/MINIVANS: Buick Terraza, Chevrolet Uplander, Saturn Relay, Nissan Quest. SMALL SUVS: Kia Sportage. MIDSIZED SUVS: Mercedes-Benz M-Class*, Land Rover LR3 (V8), Cadillac SRX (V8), Mercedes-Benz R-Class*, Volkswagen Touareg, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Hummer H3*, BMW X5 (V8, 2006), Volvo XC90 (6 & V8), Ford Explorer (V8), Mercury Mountaineer (V8). LARGE SUVS: Nissan Armada, Infiniti QX56, Lincoln Navigator, Hummer H2. PICKUP TRUCKS: Nissan Titan, Ford F-250 (TurboDiesel), Dodge Dakota (4WD), Cadillac Escalade EXT (2006).
__________________ 2002 T/A LS-1 26k Happy now girls |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Someone Crown My Ass! Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North East, MD USA
Posts: 7,017
| Quote:
That is a given! I don't see your list of car engines ![]()
__________________ 2002 T/A LS-1 26k Happy now girls | |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Whats that thing ? Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Montgomery Township, PA
Posts: 2,544
| So Jesse, you would rely on what you read in trade magazines, over the real life experience of someone with personal knowledge ?? I bet you are one of those guys that buys your stuff based on what you read in consumer reports magazine...
__________________ 1987 GN - The Black One |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Someone Crown My Ass! Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North East, MD USA
Posts: 7,017
| No but they are a consumer based magazine. I have about as real life as you can get having owned both. I can honestly say I have never had my Toyota, Mazda or Honda products to a dealer ever! I ran them way up in mileage. I did have my last Civic in for a recall on the floor mat... yes floor mat! They installed a grommet to hold it in place but that was it. Close as I have been to the service department. Can't say the same for the GM and Fords I have owned.
__________________ 2002 T/A LS-1 26k Happy now girls |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) | |
| I'm the Best! | Quote:
3.1 know many people with over180k never touched it the eco tecs arent THAT bad what else is there? the new 3.9 and 3.5 people seem to love.
__________________ Rob 87 GN fully loaded.. learning to walk again ![]() 03 vw GTI- wicked tuning turbo back, forged 007 diverter.. revo stage 2 coming soon 04 SC/MCSS 14.89 gone ![]() "But the day may come when you've got something to lose, and just when you think you're done paying dues And you say to yourself, dear God what Have I done? And hope its not too late 'cause tomorrow may never come." | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| I'm the Best! | you know i dont get it... if these GM's are so bad then i must be the luckyest person ever. my monte i hammer in to the ground.. ice cold fresh start up beating the balls off of it. beating it to the point where the manifolds are cherry red that my car has NEVER been in for anything. its been in once. for the steering colum (the grease thing broke and causes a clunking). thats it! oh and they found a exhaust leak that i've never herd. 46k on the clock and to this day i still treat it the same. my freinds tahoe 250k on it still towing with it never been touched my friends farm trucks everyone of them over 200k never been touched my friends montes, gp's, bonnies, it goes on and on and on! you should stop reading on the net and get real world experence with them. i'll only buy gm because thats what i'm comfterable with. to me they're the most relaible
__________________ Rob 87 GN fully loaded.. learning to walk again ![]() 03 vw GTI- wicked tuning turbo back, forged 007 diverter.. revo stage 2 coming soon 04 SC/MCSS 14.89 gone ![]() "But the day may come when you've got something to lose, and just when you think you're done paying dues And you say to yourself, dear God what Have I done? And hope its not too late 'cause tomorrow may never come." |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |