TurboBuicks.com  

Go Back   TurboBuicks.com > Technical Forums > Buick V6 Turbo Tech
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Garage Store Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-06-2008, 10:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
stickybones
Now what?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 317
Reuse stock camshaft?

Can a used camshaft be reused without harm? New lifters will be installed and breakin will be appropriate. The reason I ask is that I'm sick of the chit, chit, chit, chit, chit, chit diesel noise of the my Comp 206/206 flat tappet cam with Sealed Power(?) lifters. I want QUIET again. The stock cam never made my car sound like a POS like this setup does. Although I still have the stock lifters, I don't have them categorized by lobe so therefore I can't reuse them. I actually prefer to go with a new "performance" cam since I have no way of knowing if my stocker is still in spec and I like the performance of the 206/206. recommends an Erson 208/208 per the search and says it's quiet. My only concern with another non-stock cam is that it too may result in a noisy combination. Anyone local to me have a performance flat tappet cam setup that they claim is quiet that I can hear and compare?

BTW, the stock cam was replaced when my engine was rebuilt after I snapped the timing chain.

If TurboJim or gbsean are lurking on this thread, they're probably shaking their heads at my foolishness.
__________________
1987 GN -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
stickybones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 10:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
NJBuickRacer
I thought I was out...
 
NJBuickRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Brunswick NJ
Posts: 1,286
The last 206 I installed was quiet...What is your lifter preload?
__________________
Artie
86 GN Stock Motor 3690lb race weight through the mufflers 11.22@117.9 (with all the applicable safety equipment for ET and speeds attained, including 6pt bar and harnesses)Sold
LC2 Powered hybrid project in progress
NJBuickRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 10:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Steve Wood
An American American
 
Steve Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: East of Eden, Texas
Posts: 37,175
The cam should be quiet. Beyond the preload, try a set of GM lifters...there have been a lot of cheap import lifters that have flooded the market the past few years.

Personally, I have never had problems putting a new set of lifters on an old cam. These days, I see a lot of people horrified by the thought. Of course, I see a lot of things that worked for years that supposedly won't work these days.
__________________
------------------
'A government that is big enough to give you everything you want, is also big enough to take away everything you

have.'

- Thomas Jefferson


I think one should worry more when people are lining up to get out of a country rather than into it.

If they're sneaking in, we must be doing something right.
The Chronicles of Zap, from the early 21st century

www.vortexbuicks-etc.com





Steve Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2008, 10:58 PM   #4 (permalink)
Orlando_87GN
Resident Idiot
 
Orlando_87GN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 10,458
Send a message via AIM to Orlando_87GN
If you are going through the trouble of removing your old cam why use a used one? The risk of saving $50 is not worth it. Buy a new cam kit. Most come with lifters. The one I would recommend is the Edlebrock 204/214 from Summit at ~$125.
__________________
Check Out MikesStuff4Sale.com to view my used parts!


------------------------------------------------
1987 Buick Grand National
Budget 4.1, 204/214 cam, TA-49 Turbo, Stockish Heads, V4, MSD50's, TH DP, JayJackson 62mm TB, Translator plus Extender powered. 3680# with pilot
------------------------------------------------
1993 Mazda RX-7 4.1 Buick Powered
11.20 @ 128mph (2.4 60')!
Orlando_87GN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 12:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
GNVYUS 1
Registered User
 
GNVYUS 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 856
Check preload, if ok and noisy then I'd think the next cheapest way to go is GM lifters and try again. The stock camshaft is lame and not worth the lobe risk since it's already been used and not as powerful.
__________________
Mike
87GN T-Top down 423lbs.
Rebuild #2, BLK/BL Paint w/Custom Metal Flares, VPE Stg 3 Heads, 210/215 Roller Cam, TA49, V2 w/Blitz Blow Off, Billet Drum/Input, PI 3400 5disc, T Brake, Inland 3.5" DS, KB Plenum/70mm TB, Razor's Post Turbo Alky Kit, Devils Pre Turbo Alky Kit, 60lb Inj, Denso 280 Pump,-8/-6 SS Fuel Lines, MBC, Pwr Plt, PTE Oil Relocator, Preluber, Z06 Maf, Translator, Volt Master, Poston Headers, THSS 3.5" DP/Test Pipe, SS 2.5" Y Pipe w/No Muffs, PST 2" Drop, Poly Bushings, Boxed Upper/Lower Arms, QA1 Shocks, Vacuum Converted, Aerospace 11" Brakes w/SS lines, Alum Drums, Polished Autodrags 15x8/15x10, Nitto 555R 275/60's
GNVYUS 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 06:31 AM   #6 (permalink)
stickybones
Now what?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 317
I checked preload as best I could with everything still assembled. (I used an adjustable pushrod, tightened it to "zero" lash, took it out and compared it with the pushrods in there.) I came up with ~0.055 to 0.060" preload on average for the ones that had reasonable access to get to. I shimmed the rocker shafts with 0.020" shims to reduce preload. Neither setup made a discernible difference in noise in my opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando_87GN View Post
If you are going through the trouble of removing your old cam why use a used one? The risk of saving $50 is not worth it.
You're right Mike, but the only reason I was going back to stock was NOISE. I'd prefer a performance cam, but unless I know it'll be quiet, I don't want to go thru the trouble and end up with the same issue.

I guess I can try Steve's and Mike's (lots of Mikes here) idea and just replace the lifters with another set purchased from GM. (They show up in GMPartsDirect.) Maybe the lifters I have in there now are junk. At least that way I can spare myself the trouble of pulling the cam. I assume I can just glob some breakin lube on the base of the new lifters, drop them in the bores, put it all back together and run the breakin and see...or hear. At least this will only be a ~$150 in parts with much less labor if it were to fail.

I'll see if the local stealer has 12 lifters for sale.

Thanks
Mike
__________________
1987 GN -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
stickybones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 08:27 AM   #7 (permalink)
Orlando_87GN
Resident Idiot
 
Orlando_87GN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 10,458
Send a message via AIM to Orlando_87GN
Quote:
You're right Mike, but the only reason I was going back to stock was NOISE. I'd prefer a performance cam, but unless I know it'll be quiet, I don't want to go thru the trouble and end up with the same issue.
I understand and share your concern. I hate noisy cams as well. The Edlebrock cam is silent. The loudest noise I hear under the hood is the injectors ticking which is why I recommended it. New cam, new lifters and it even comes with the lube you need. For $125 it's an easy and safe choice.
__________________
Check Out MikesStuff4Sale.com to view my used parts!


------------------------------------------------
1987 Buick Grand National
Budget 4.1, 204/214 cam, TA-49 Turbo, Stockish Heads, V4, MSD50's, TH DP, JayJackson 62mm TB, Translator plus Extender powered. 3680# with pilot
------------------------------------------------
1993 Mazda RX-7 4.1 Buick Powered
11.20 @ 128mph (2.4 60')!
Orlando_87GN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 10:42 AM   #8 (permalink)
VETHNTER
Registered User
 
VETHNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: woolwich, nj
Posts: 99
i have the 208/208 with sealed power lifters. car sounds stock.
__________________
MAGNA MEMBER

1986 Buick GN, 89,000 miles,stock block, ta-49,mease 3 in. dp, mease stretch intercooler w/ 3in. neck, 60lb injectors,hotwire,powerplate,hooker catback without the cat and the all important Meases alchy.
VETHNTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 10:45 AM   #9 (permalink)
Just a Six??
I Buried Beachbum Here!
 
Just a Six??'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 10,812
Erson & GM Lifters is Super Quiet!! I think its the Lifters tho & not so much the cam choice that makes noise. get GM Lifters!
__________________
87 LTD. Purchased May 88
Doeskin leather, coach lites, moonroof & carpeted trunk. No Factory Hood Ornament!
Special order by the VP of GM Canada! Not another like it!
Lots of Go Fast goodies!
11.5 is as Fast as I go! Thats what the track told me!


It's a Small World, but I wouldn't want to Paint It!!
Just a Six?? is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:10 AM   #10 (permalink)
gbsean
1 of 64,000,000
 
gbsean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Flanders, N.J.
Posts: 10,656
Send a message via Yahoo to gbsean
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickybones View Post
snapped the timing chain.

If TurboJim or gbsean are lurking on this thread, they're probably shaking their heads at my foolishness.
when you were over the other week...I didn't think it was noisey.....at least no more than any other car....not so that it focused my attention.....get a set of ear plugs....
__________________
11.599 @ 119.91

eat that Ferret Joe and JoeNational
Tuning in Progress

Sean Ryder
Buick Performance Group Vice-Chairman
www.buickperformancegroup.com

see thread for Engine Specs
http://www.turbobuicks.com/forums/wa...tml#post680751

happy now Rich
gbsean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 11:16 AM   #11 (permalink)
ULYCYC
Fuhgeddaboudit
 
ULYCYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 16,721
You may want to try shorter pushrods and get the preload in the .025-.030 range and toss the shims. What you have now is .040 +- some and thats on the edge of too much preload.
__________________
ED BAKER
87-T, Maplight equipped rear view mirror..
93 PARK AVE"SUPERCHARGED"
BPG#1458
My Photo Page

buickperformancegroup.com

"As democracy is perfected, the office of President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."---H.L. Mencken 1927
ULYCYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 12:09 PM   #12 (permalink)
stickybones
Now what?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 317
Quote:
Originally Posted by gbsean View Post
when you were over the other week...I didn't think it was noisey.....at least no more than any other car....not so that it focused my attention......
That's part of the problem with internet diagnostics (although that's not the case with you and Jim...you actually heard the car). What's noisy and annoying to me sounds normal to others. Your car and TurboJim's have roller cams and a much louder exhaust then mine which helps drown out the underhood sounds and prevents me from making a clean comparison between our cars.

That and the fact that it seems every car reacts somewhat differently to the "same" parts. For whatever reason, my combination is too loud for my taste, but others with the same parts have no issues.

If I decide to just swap lifters, I'll be able to more accurately measure the current preload because I'll have the intake off.

Ed...are you saying that too much preload can also cause excessive noise? Most, if not all of the search results focus on too little preload causing the dreaded tick.
__________________
1987 GN -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
stickybones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2008, 12:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
ULYCYC
Fuhgeddaboudit
 
ULYCYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 16,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by stickybones View Post
Ed...are you saying that too much preload can also cause excessive noise? Most, if not all of the search results focus on too little preload causing the dreaded tick.
Too much preload can prevent the lifter from pumping up with oil and function like a hyd lifter. I'm not saying it's your noise (could be) but it has to be set correct.
__________________
ED BAKER
87-T, Maplight equipped rear view mirror..
93 PARK AVE"SUPERCHARGED"
BPG#1458
My Photo Page

buickperformancegroup.com

"As democracy is perfected, the office of President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."---H.L. Mencken 1927
ULYCYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 07:54 AM   #14 (permalink)
TwoBuicks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Garfield Hts. Ohio
Posts: 86
Check your original cam to see if there is a groove on the number1 bearing journal. Most of the original cams did not have this groove, as the groove was in the block for oil transfer to the drivers side lifters. Most aftermarket cams HAVE this groove in the #1 bearing journal of the cam so the cam can be used in either design block. I had my groove spray welded closed (before I went to the billet roller cam) and my "206" cam was quiet, but that was before it started going flat! Mark
TwoBuicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2008, 10:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
stickybones
Now what?
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Hopatcong, NJ
Posts: 317
My stock cam does not have this groove. I don't know if the 206 cam in there does.

What are you saying; that this groove could somehow be contributing to the noise?
__________________
1987 GN -> 11.81@117.8mph...93+alky thru the cat w/ a TA49
2005 Subaru Forester XT
2007 TB SS
stickybones is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stock rotating assembly, 8445 heads 1985GN Parts For Sale 5 01-27-2007 05:23 PM
STOCK parts, tubor, I/C etc, LS1 MAF FastRegalWE2 Parts For Sale 11 11-08-2006 12:41 AM
stock turbo -no play at all +others EVIL87 Parts For Sale 0 11-02-2006 11:54 PM
Stock And Misc....Check! Spl170s Parts For Sale 2 06-21-2005 02:33 PM
Chrome-plated Stock Inlet Pipe, chips misc. F/S xtremexnyc Parts For Sale 2 03-11-2002 07:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0