| | | | | ![]() | |
| | | | | ||
![]() | | | |||
| | | | | ||
| | | | | ||
| | | | |||
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,098
|
Pros- more cubic inches, the bigger bore will help breathing by unshrouding the valves. More torque, less boost required to reach a given horsepower. Cons- money, and the 4.1 block is not quite as strong as the 3.8 block. Probably should use a girdle, while you're at it.
__________________ George W- |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Certified gun nut Join Date: May 2005 Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 1,843
|
4.1 block +.035 and a 3.625" crank = 273 cubes....
__________________ Art Wittig / Reading, PA '87 GN... RJC girdled 109, +.020 Diamond pistons, K1 rods, Cat crank, T/A heads, Champion intake,plenum and fuel rails, 1.55 TA rockers, 70mm Accufab, 214/214-.548/.548 Comp hyd roller, Comp 26120 beehives, 70GTQ, 83lb injectors, A1000 pump, MagnaFuel regulator, 15gal aluminum cell, Razors Alky kit, GN1 FMIC, LS1 MAF & translator, TurboTweak 6.0 chip, Powerlogger, LM-1 Wideband O2, 3" THDP, ATR Pitbull exhaust, TH400 w/brake, 9.5" PTC, Dynotech 3.5" alum DS, Moser C-clip axles. |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |