| | | | | ![]() | |
| | | | | ||
![]() | | | |||
| | | | | ||
| | | | | ||
| | | | |||
| | #1 (permalink) |
| 2 Busy 2 Boost Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: PA
Posts: 42
| I had this posted on the other board and was told I might be able to get ahold of you here. Anyway, I was just doing a little brainstorming and wondered what the effect would be on lowering a car with a GNX rear suspension 2+ inches. Would it cause it to bind at all since the panhard bar is at an angle? How would the instant center need to be corrected? Also, what would the widest tires be that could fit under there, assuming mini tubbing and frame notching would be needed since the car will be lowered. (No rolled/trimmed fender lips). I wasn't sure if any part of the GNX suspension was closer to the outside of the car than the original suspension or not. I figured a 295/50R15 should fit, but does anyone think a 305, 315, or 325/50R15 would fit? I realize the frame would probably have to be resupported in some way to take the extra stress from being notched. Thanks in advance.
__________________ -Dan '87 GN |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Warminster Pensylvania
Posts: 777
| I'm no expert, but lowering the GNX sspension I would expect would reduce its purpose. Under boost the suspension raises up in the rear, so lowering it may inhibit it in some way. Again, I'm no expert, but just food for thought. Good luck! dunno
__________________ High Mile Rosewood Turbo T / 94' 1500 Blazer |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Registered User Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 6,431
| He ain't here. Try autosound or whatever the name of that forum he moderates is called.
__________________ WE4, 155K, Daily Driver, DBLBBGT70, 55lb.Inj., Pedophile DP, hollow cat.,Schertz Hi-Pro and 3200Protorque, Postons Headers, 2 1/2"SS Ultraflows and pipes, Ex.Ext. alky chip, EGT/Bilsteins, Boxed Cont. arms/Airbags/snubber,Blizzak snows, Nittos 275/60DR, 307, adj.reg./ SMC alky dual, 9 gauges,scamaster and D.Scan,BSTC, translator and 31/2"MAF, V4 inter. DYNO. TESTED!!! 11.93 @ 113.7 GN loaded, car #2. 115K miles. Accufab reg.,Scanmaster, Reds 100 chip, Mease downpipe, Mease 15row stretch IC, hollow cat., ATR ss. 3"crossflow, SMC alky., J.J. 62mm.T.B., RJC power plate, Bilsteins, Moog springs, HR Parts mount and rear arms, Nittos. "Some Cars Like Lots Of Fuel Pressure and Some Cars Are On Blocks." 12.4 @ 111 |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| 2 Busy 2 Boost Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: PA
Posts: 42
| Booboo, I thought about that and came to two conclusions. 1. Since the car was lowered, the GNX susp. might raise the car even more depending on spring rates; or 2. Some of the mounting points for the GNX susp. would have to be slightly altered or what-not. Salvage, thanks. I'll see if I can track him down elsewhere.
__________________ -Dan '87 GN |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |