TurboBuicks.com  

Go Back   TurboBuicks.com > Technical Forums > Alcohol, Propane & Nitrous
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Garage Store Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-13-2008, 08:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
GNNOVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Park, PA
Posts: 23
What are the advantages of the controller system over the DIY

I'm looking at putting an alcohol system on my GN and was looking for some input on the advantages of one of the contoller bassed systems (Razor, Coolmist) as compared to a DIY system using a Hobbs switch and NOS jets?

Ken
__________________
87 GN, TE62, TH SS down pipe, Hooker Catback, Homemade Cold Air intake with 9" K&N cone, ATR roller cam, Self ported heads, T&D roller rockers, Steel main caps, .020 over with JE pistons, 60lb injectors with Turbotweak 93 chip, homemade stretched intercooler, 12.1@115.8 with 16lbs boost and BF TA radials
GNNOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 11:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
Orlando_87GN
Resident Idiot
 
Orlando_87GN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 10,153
Send a message via AIM to Orlando_87GN
Main difference is progressively spraying the fuel, like a duty cycle. A hobbs switch is either on of off with no adjustment in the middle. Check out the CoolingMist controller, it's superior to the other ones out there.
__________________
Check Out MikesStuff4Sale.com to view my used parts!


------------------------------------------------
1987 Buick Grand National
Budget 4.1, 204/214 cam, TA-49 Turbo, Stockish Heads, V4, MSD50's, TH DP, JayJackson 62mm TB, Translator plus Extender powered. 3680# with pilot
------------------------------------------------
1987 Turbo T with 5,888 Original miles FOR SALE!
------------------------------------------------
1993 Mazda RX-7 4.1 Buick Powered
11.20 @ 128mph (2.4 60')!
Orlando_87GN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 12:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
GNNOVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Park, PA
Posts: 23
Since I have not road in a car with alcohol injection, I'm a little nieve. Does the car react better to a progress activation as opposed to the instant on?
__________________
87 GN, TE62, TH SS down pipe, Hooker Catback, Homemade Cold Air intake with 9" K&N cone, ATR roller cam, Self ported heads, T&D roller rockers, Steel main caps, .020 over with JE pistons, 60lb injectors with Turbotweak 93 chip, homemade stretched intercooler, 12.1@115.8 with 16lbs boost and BF TA radials
GNNOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 02:25 PM   #4 (permalink)
Orlando_87GN
Resident Idiot
 
Orlando_87GN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 10,153
Send a message via AIM to Orlando_87GN
Definitely.
__________________
Check Out MikesStuff4Sale.com to view my used parts!


------------------------------------------------
1987 Buick Grand National
Budget 4.1, 204/214 cam, TA-49 Turbo, Stockish Heads, V4, MSD50's, TH DP, JayJackson 62mm TB, Translator plus Extender powered. 3680# with pilot
------------------------------------------------
1987 Turbo T with 5,888 Original miles FOR SALE!
------------------------------------------------
1993 Mazda RX-7 4.1 Buick Powered
11.20 @ 128mph (2.4 60')!
Orlando_87GN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 02:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
GNNOVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Park, PA
Posts: 23
Is the difference enough to justify 300 dollars. I can build one with a hobbs switch for 200.00 and a controller system is around 500.00. This will be on a low twelve high eleven second GN.
__________________
87 GN, TE62, TH SS down pipe, Hooker Catback, Homemade Cold Air intake with 9" K&N cone, ATR roller cam, Self ported heads, T&D roller rockers, Steel main caps, .020 over with JE pistons, 60lb injectors with Turbotweak 93 chip, homemade stretched intercooler, 12.1@115.8 with 16lbs boost and BF TA radials
GNNOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 03:45 PM   #6 (permalink)
Orlando_87GN
Resident Idiot
 
Orlando_87GN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Orlando, FL USA
Posts: 10,153
Send a message via AIM to Orlando_87GN
Guess it's up to you. I tried the hobbs switch home made system and the car always bogged down bad when the switch came on. The cooling mist controller has turn on point, high set point and a duty cycle knob. It also sports a serial port connection to datalog what the controller is doing on your laptop. Best yet, it has a 3bar map built into it, so no need to buy another $70 GM sensor.
__________________
Check Out MikesStuff4Sale.com to view my used parts!


------------------------------------------------
1987 Buick Grand National
Budget 4.1, 204/214 cam, TA-49 Turbo, Stockish Heads, V4, MSD50's, TH DP, JayJackson 62mm TB, Translator plus Extender powered. 3680# with pilot
------------------------------------------------
1987 Turbo T with 5,888 Original miles FOR SALE!
------------------------------------------------
1993 Mazda RX-7 4.1 Buick Powered
11.20 @ 128mph (2.4 60')!
Orlando_87GN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 05:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Zap's Master and Superior
Spiritual Advisor
 
Zap's Master and Superior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 147 MLK blvd. The Great Wall Of China Suburbs : Section 8
Posts: 2,987
A system that functions with a switch rather than progessively adds alky it will be impossible to tune to perfection. You will be faced with either running a lower boost than you ultimately want or you will be faced with dealing with engine bog at the spray on point when using the on/off systems. You have to spray enough alky to satify the knock supression needs at full boost but you have to select a turn on point before max boost is reached (considerably far from when max boost is reached) so if you are trying to quench 24psi of boost you will have to spray enough alky to satisfy the knock supression needs of 24psi but you will have to start spraying that maybe as early as the 5psi mark. This can and usually does create quite a bit of bog at the spray on point. The progressive systems can start spraying minute amounts at the turn on point and ramp up the volume as boost rises. This eliminates the bogging of the engine due to excesssive amounts of alky at lower boost levels. This also protects you against overboost situations. If your car overboosts to 28psi by chance the alky will continue to ramp up to meet the needs of the added boost. An on/off system can't offer that protection.

If you are wondering if the progressive system is worth the doe do a search. Try and find one person that says they wished they hadn't purchased their progressive system but rather had purchased an on/off system instead. I have used Razor's Alkycontrol system and love it. It was designed from the ground up with Turbo Regals in mind. WWW.ALKYCONTROL.COM
__________________
Yao Min-WoodDSR's Minister of Foreign Affairs Member #69

The Gayest statement made on the internet EVER.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beachbum View Post
Eric, stop it! I'm drooling. I want it.
TBS.com most memorable quote EVER.
http://www.turbobuicks.com/forums/301920-post42.html
Zap's Master and Superior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 06:05 PM   #8 (permalink)
coolingmist
Turbo Buicks Vendor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 158
Our progressive systems offer the ability to give more flow with more boost. with a fixed rate on/off system they will work for you but will lack tune-ability. You will get results, but not as good. If you want the max horsepower go with the Vari-Cool progressive.

Vari-Cool is the only digital progressive controller on the market that has a tuning gain feature. If you go with a progressive kit, dont overspend on an Analog controller.

All of our systems have a lifetime warranty to the original owner, you should check us out at Water Injection, Methanol Injection systems | Coolingmist. We sell fixed rate on/off as well as progressive kits.

Ask any questions I will be glad to answer.
__________________
Methanol Water Injection Kits and controllers.
www.coolingmist.com
coolingmist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 07:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
GNNOVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Park, PA
Posts: 23
Thanks guys for the info. This is just what I was looking for. Now I can make an informed decision. I guess I need to save some money.

Ken
__________________
87 GN, TE62, TH SS down pipe, Hooker Catback, Homemade Cold Air intake with 9" K&N cone, ATR roller cam, Self ported heads, T&D roller rockers, Steel main caps, .020 over with JE pistons, 60lb injectors with Turbotweak 93 chip, homemade stretched intercooler, 12.1@115.8 with 16lbs boost and BF TA radials
GNNOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 07:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
Grumpy
Registered User
 
Grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Andover, Ma
Posts: 10,955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zap's Master and Superior View Post
I have used Razor's Alkycontrol system and love it. It was designed from the ground up with Turbo Regals in mind. WWW.ALKYCONTROL.COM
X2 "KISS" keep it simple stupid My daughter ran in the 9s with her street driven GN with Julio's system
__________________
Dan
dont run your mouth if you cant run your car


86/87 GN and 89 TTA .. tons of parts !! Time to get out! Stuff has to go !!! Otherwise I am cutting it up and throwing it away email ttastage2@yahoo.com
Grumpy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2008, 08:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
salvageV6
Registered User
 
salvageV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 6,368
Lightbulb

There are many simple ways to progressively spray alky. much cheaper than a controller.

For the level you intend to run at if you can build the DIY system you could easily make it progressive enough to not bog the motor.

Sometimes keeping it simple keeps the $$$ in your pocket.
salvageV6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 05:07 AM   #12 (permalink)
GNNOVA
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Park, PA
Posts: 23
SalvageV6 How would I make the DIY system more like a progressive for a softer hit. I like cheaper. I don't realy want to go more than 20lbs of boost. The car is to nice to beat it or put in a roll bar. I just want to run pump gas and not have a lot of knock. At present I can't get over 16lbs of boost or I'll pull a lot of knock.

Ken
__________________
87 GN, TE62, TH SS down pipe, Hooker Catback, Homemade Cold Air intake with 9" K&N cone, ATR roller cam, Self ported heads, T&D roller rockers, Steel main caps, .020 over with JE pistons, 60lb injectors with Turbotweak 93 chip, homemade stretched intercooler, 12.1@115.8 with 16lbs boost and BF TA radials
GNNOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 08:03 AM   #13 (permalink)
TurboBuickSix
Not a Selfproclaimed guru
 
TurboBuickSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Buffalo,NY
Posts: 415
If I was going to use a DIY I would use 2 hobbs switches and a variable or fixed resistor inline with the low side to provide less power to the pump then the 2nd switch will come in at higher boost to provide full flow. I am also considering this. If I go with a plug and play it would probably be coolingmist because cost compared to the diy setup is significant. Lots of guys were spraying alchy like this for years before any of these kits came around,granted NONE of them were in the 9's but 11's were easily obtained before progressive kits were used and that was your stated goal. Just alot more effort to get the tune right but it can be done and it has.DIY Alcohol Injection System The progressive kits are very attractive though, better performance is alot easier to obtain, and everything comes in one box for instant gratification and the support is reportedly very good.
__________________
Dave Schreiber,86 GN. 12.00@114
1980 Berlinetta Camaro 40k miles
TurboBuickSix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 11:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
ULYCYC
Fuhgeddaboudit
 
ULYCYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 16,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboBuickSix View Post
Lots of guys were spraying alchy like this for years before any of these kits came around,granted NONE of them were in the 9's but 11's were easily obtained before progressive kits were used and that was your stated goal.
Yep,,That's because they weren't 9 sec cars to start with. No system is going to make a 10sec or 11 sec car magically into a 9 sec car. That's like saying Powerade drink got the funnycar to break the track record
__________________
ED BAKER
87-T, Maplight equipped rear view mirror..
93 PARK AVE"SUPERCHARGED"
BPG#1458
My Photo Page

buickperformancegroup.com
ULYCYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 12:49 PM   #15 (permalink)
TurboBuickSix
Not a Selfproclaimed guru
 
TurboBuickSix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Buffalo,NY
Posts: 415
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULYCYC View Post
Yep,,That's because they weren't 9 sec cars to start with. No system is going to make a 10sec or 11 sec car magically into a 9 sec car. That's like saying Powerade drink got the funnycar to break the track record
Yep, that's outrageous!! Who would think that ANY system could do that?
__________________
Dave Schreiber,86 GN. 12.00@114
1980 Berlinetta Camaro 40k miles
TurboBuickSix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
America's finest... Cadillac! CallMeMud The Waiting Room 95 04-19-2007 04:31 PM
New Methanol Injection Controller coolingmist Alcohol, Propane & Nitrous 6 01-20-2006 02:23 PM
Conley's Performance Plus screws me :-( -------> sgpracer The Waiting Room 18 11-01-2001 05:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0