TurboBuicks.com - View Single Post

Mr. T · 06-11-2002, 10:32 PM

The turbos used for our cars generally aren't big enough to need nitrous, and the ones that are big enough have efficiencys greater then our RPM band (our 3.8s arent good revvers) So, I would say that is part of the reason you dont see many with NOS. However if you have a T-88 or something, and run outstanding times, I would reccomend it. However, if you wanted to get better response from your turbo, I would go the true and tested way, bore/stroke that mofo! http://www.turbobuicks.com/ubb/wink.gif

------------------
'87 T .030 overbore/ big cam/ heads port/ polish/ all 3in. pipes (exh and int)inc. MAF/ j&e/ 42.5lb inj. +7th inj./ TE44/ Precision Frontmount/ houston DP/ intercooler scoop/ 11.5in M/T's/ @ 24psi best ET ??.?? @ ???.??

06-11-2002, 10:32 PM	#2 (permalink)
Mr. T Junior Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Florida Posts: 137	The turbos used for our cars generally aren't big enough to need nitrous, and the ones that are big enough have efficiencys greater then our RPM band (our 3.8s arent good revvers) So, I would say that is part of the reason you dont see many with NOS. However if you have a T-88 or something, and run outstanding times, I would reccomend it. However, if you wanted to get better response from your turbo, I would go the true and tested way, bore/stroke that mofo! http://www.turbobuicks.com/ubb/wink.gif ------------------ '87 T .030 overbore/ big cam/ heads port/ polish/ all 3in. pipes (exh and int)inc. MAF/ j&e/ 42.5lb inj. +7th inj./ TE44/ Precision Frontmount/ houston DP/ intercooler scoop/ 11.5in M/T's/ @ 24psi best ET ??.?? @ ???.?? __________________ '87 T .030 overbore/ 240 cam/ heads port/ polish/ all 3in. pipes (exh and int)inc. MAF/ j&e pistons/ 42.5lb inj. +7th inj./ TE44/ Precision Frontmount/ houston DP/ METCO lower control arms/ and alot of other stuff I didn't think of /11.5in M/T's/ @ 21.5psi best ET ??.?? @ ???.??